Research Highlights:
- Using a one cuff size-fits-all approach when measuring blood pressure may lead to striking inaccuracies in blood pressure measurement and diagnosis, according to a new study.
- Inaccurate readings due to wrong cuff size were particularly evident in people with obesity, who require large or extra-large cuff sizes for accurate blood pressure readings.
- It is important for health care professionals and the public to recognize the importance of cuff size for office, kiosk and home blood pressure measurement.
Embargoed until 1 p.m. CT/2 p.m. ET Tuesday, March 1, 2022
DALLAS, March 1, 2022 — Using a one cuff size-fits-all approach when measuring blood pressure may lead to striking inaccuracies in blood pressure measurement and diagnosis, according to preliminary research to be presented at the American Heart Association’s Epidemiology, Prevention, Lifestyle & Cardiometabolic Health Conference 2022. The meeting will be held in-person in Chicago and virtually Tuesday, March 1 – Friday, March 4, 2022, and offers the latest in population-based science related to the promotion of cardiovascular health and the prevention of heart disease and stroke.
“Accurate blood pressure measurement depends on proper patient preparation, positioning, measurement technique and individualized selection of cuff size, which should be based on the measured mid-arm circumference,” said study author Tammy M. Brady, M.D., Ph.D., vice chair for clinical research in pediatrics, associate professor of pediatrics in the division of pediatric nephrology and medical director of the Pediatric Hypertension Program at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. “While clinical practice guidelines highlight the importance of individualized blood pressure cuff selection for measuring blood pressure, most of the research looking at cuff size on measurement accuracy was done using mercury sphygmomanometers which are blood pressure monitors in which the cuff is manually inflated and blood pressure is determined by listening for arterial sounds through a stethoscope. We looked at how cuff size impacts blood pressure readings with today’s widely used automated blood pressure monitors.”
High blood pressure increases risks for heart disease, stroke, kidney disease, visual loss and more. It also causes death. In 2019, more than half a million people who died in the U.S. had high blood pressure as a primary or contributing cause of death.
Nearly half of adults in the U.S. have high blood pressure, defined by the 2017 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology high blood pressure guidelines as systolic (top number) blood pressure equal to or greater than 130 mm Hg or a diastolic (bottom number) blood pressure equal to or greater than 80 mm Hg. However, many people don’t know they have high blood pressure. The best way to find out if an individual has high blood pressure is to get it checked.
In this study, researchers analyzed blood pressure readings of 165 community-dwelling adults (average age of 55 years, one-third were male and 68% were Black adults). During a single setting, researchers compared the average of three blood pressure readings using a regular, adult-sized cuff versus the average of three blood pressure readings obtained using a cuff appropriately sized for the individual. Before each set of three blood pressure measurements, study participants were asked to walk a similar distance from a waiting area to the blood pressure measurement station to eliminate the potential effect of a longer resting period on the results obtained during each of the sets of blood pressure measurements. Once participants were seated properly, blood pressure measurements were started 5 minutes after cuff placement. Participants had three sequential automated blood pressure measurements, 30 seconds apart. The participants did not speak during the measurements and refrained from using a smart phone, and the room was kept quiet.
Researchers found:
- 30% of study participants had systolic blood pressure equal to or higher than 130 mm Hg.
- More than 40% of all participants had a body mass index of ≥30kg/m2, meeting the criteria for obesity.
- Among the participants who required a small adult cuff (based on the measured mid-arm circumference), a regular-sized adult cuff resulted in notably lower blood pressure readings, including an average of 3.8 mm Hg lower systolic reading and 1.5 mm Hg lower diastolic reading.
- In contrast, among those who required a large or extra-large adult cuff, a regular-sized cuff was associated with significantly higher readings, including an average 4.8 mm Hg and 19.7 mm Hg higher systolic reading, respectively.
“On average, individuals who required an extra-large cuff based on their measured mid-arm circumference had a blood pressure of 143.9/86.5 mm Hg when a regular adult cuff was used, which is a measurement in the range for a diagnosis of stage 2 hypertension. When using the appropriately sized cuff for the same participants, blood pressure readings were an average of 124.2/79.1 mm Hg, which is within the normal range,” Brady said. “In our study, the overestimation of blood pressure due to using a cuff that is too small misclassified 39% of participants as being hypertensive, while the underestimation of blood pressure due to using a cuff that is too large missed 22% of participants with hypertension.”
Based on these findings, individuals who require the large adult and extra-large adult cuff sizes may be most at risk for mismeasurement, misclassification and potential over-treatment in the clinical setting.
“It’s important for health care professionals and the public to recognize the importance of cuff size for the clinician’s office, kiosk and home blood pressure measurement. For example, cuff size may be even more important in communities with high prevalence of obesity, since large or extra-large cuff sizes may provide more accurate blood pressure readings in those individuals,” Brady said.
“The American Heart Association is collaborating with community health centers across the country on a new evidence-based national hypertension control initiative to manage blood pressure and reduce poor health outcomes for disproportionately impacted racial and ethnic groups,” said Willie Lawrence, M.D., medical director for the Center for Better Health and Cardiovascular Wellness at Spectrum Health Lakeland in Benton Harbor, Michigan and chair of the American Heart Association’s National Hypertension Control Initiative Advisory Committee. “Ensuring proper blood pressure measurement, monitoring both at home and in a health care setting, and developing a plan with the patient for reduction in high blood pressure are important parts of the initiative and proven to manage blood pressure.”
A study limitation is this research was conducted in a primarily urban adult population with a limited number of participants. Future studies should examine the potential effects of mis-cuffing on other populations, including children and higher risk adult populations.
Co-authors are Jeanne Charleston, R.N.; Junichi Ishigami, M.D., M.P.H., Ph.D.; Greg Prokopowichz, M.D., M.P.H.; Edgar R. Miller III, M.D., Ph.D.; Kunihiro Matsushita, M.D., Ph.D., FAHA; and Lawrence J. Appel, M.D., M.P.H., FAHA. Authors’ disclosures are listed in the abstract.
The study was funded by Resolve to Save Lives, which is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Gates Philanthropy.
NOTE: Presentation time for this E-Poster is 5 p.m. CT/6 p.m. ET, March 1, 2022.
Statements and conclusions of studies presented at the American Heart Association’s scientific meetings are solely those of the study authors and do not necessarily reflect the Association’s policy or position. The Association makes no representation or guarantee as to their accuracy or reliability. Abstracts presented at the Association’s scientific meetings are not peer-reviewed, rather, they are curated by independent review panels and are considered based on the potential to add to the diversity of scientific issues and views discussed at the meeting. The findings are considered preliminary until published as a full manuscript in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
The Association receives funding primarily from individuals; foundations and corporations (including pharmaceutical, device manufacturers and other companies) also make donations and fund specific Association programs and events. The Association has strict policies to prevent these relationships from influencing the science content. Revenues from pharmaceutical and biotech companies, device manufacturers and health insurance providers and the Association’s overall financial information are available here.
Additional Resources:
The American Heart Association’s EPI/LIFESTYLE 2022 Scientific Sessions is the world’s premier meeting dedicated to the latest advances in population-based science. The meeting is in-person in Chicago and virtually, Tuesday, March 1 – Friday, March 4, 2022. The meeting is focused on promoting the development and application of translational and population science to prevent heart disease and stroke and foster cardiovascular health. The sessions focus on risk factors, obesity, nutrition, physical activity, genetics, metabolism, biomarkers, subclinical disease, clinical disease, healthy populations, global health and prevention-oriented clinical trials. The Councils on Epidemiology and Prevention and Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health (Lifestyle) jointly plan the EPI/Lifestyle 2022 Scientific Sessions. Follow the conference on Twitter at #EPILifestyle22.
About the American Heart Association
The American Heart Association is a relentless force for a world of longer, healthier lives. We are dedicated to ensuring equitable health in all communities. Through collaboration with numerous organizations, and powered by millions of volunteers, we fund innovative research, advocate for the public’s health and share lifesaving resources. The Dallas-based organization has been a leading source of health information for nearly a century. Connect with us on heart.org, Facebook, Twitter or by calling 1-800-AHA-USA1.
###
For Media Inquiries and AHA Expert Perspective:
AHA Communications & Media Relations in Dallas: 214-706-1173; ahacommunications@heart.org
Cathy Lewis: cathy.lewis@heart.org
For Public Inquiries: 1-800-AHA-USA1 (242-8721)
heart.org and stroke.org
Leave a Reply